Post by account_disabled on Mar 12, 2024 23:44:25 GMT -6
A necessary protocol
CSIF, the majority union, has raised its voice about this lack. “This protocol would affect more than 230,000 people, taking into account that they are those who depend directly on the General Administration of the State and that in addition, there are companies that work with the Administration, which would also be affected by this,” points out its head of Equality. .
Of that total, he points out that “ more than 120,000 would be DJ USA women, who are most affected by sexual harassment in the workplace. It is a very serious situation that the largest company in our country does not set an example, when it should be a pioneer and lead the way for the rest of the administrations in our country and for the rest of the private companies in our economy”:
This expert emphasizes that “when someone suffers sexual or gender-based harassment, the first thing they need is to know and know that there is a mechanism that will help them . If there is no clear and confidential mechanism with deadlines in which you will be protected when you report, what many people do is be afraid and not report. In the end, dramatic situations are generated for many of these harassed people.”
In this context, “the only solution that is proposed is to change that person's focus of work to escape from their harasser, but it is really not the best solution for this type of issues. There is sexual or gender-based harassment because we receive those complaints in our union . They tell us what is happening to them, but there are no internal mechanisms for them to report it. Without this protocol, we cannot have statistics of harassed people.”
Eva Fernández confirms CSIF's feeling that “ we are facing a very serious problem .” We have been denouncing it for years with great frustration that we were about to sign it and it was not signed. It is a mechanism that has to be fast, simple, effective and confidential . This negotiated protocol established a period of 30 days to resolve these complaints.”
CSIF, the majority union, has raised its voice about this lack. “This protocol would affect more than 230,000 people, taking into account that they are those who depend directly on the General Administration of the State and that in addition, there are companies that work with the Administration, which would also be affected by this,” points out its head of Equality. .
Of that total, he points out that “ more than 120,000 would be DJ USA women, who are most affected by sexual harassment in the workplace. It is a very serious situation that the largest company in our country does not set an example, when it should be a pioneer and lead the way for the rest of the administrations in our country and for the rest of the private companies in our economy”:
This expert emphasizes that “when someone suffers sexual or gender-based harassment, the first thing they need is to know and know that there is a mechanism that will help them . If there is no clear and confidential mechanism with deadlines in which you will be protected when you report, what many people do is be afraid and not report. In the end, dramatic situations are generated for many of these harassed people.”
In this context, “the only solution that is proposed is to change that person's focus of work to escape from their harasser, but it is really not the best solution for this type of issues. There is sexual or gender-based harassment because we receive those complaints in our union . They tell us what is happening to them, but there are no internal mechanisms for them to report it. Without this protocol, we cannot have statistics of harassed people.”
Eva Fernández confirms CSIF's feeling that “ we are facing a very serious problem .” We have been denouncing it for years with great frustration that we were about to sign it and it was not signed. It is a mechanism that has to be fast, simple, effective and confidential . This negotiated protocol established a period of 30 days to resolve these complaints.”