Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 22:43:55 GMT -6
The non-commissioned officer of the judicial police of the Civil Guard in the Madrid Command, Sergio Bravo, declared a few minutes ago before the head of the Central Court of Instruction number 5 of the National Court, Santiago Pedraz , that on July 25, he summoned him to declare as investigated , shortly after Economist & Jurist exclusively published an investigation with the content of some audios in which he claimed, among other things, to have carried out illegal monitoring, prepared false reports , to be aware of alleged irregularities or improper charges in the context of the Cuarteles Case , and in which he shared data related to certain investigations with a person completely unrelated to them.
Bravo maintains before the judge the version he maintained Email Data in the letter he sent him last July : everything was a strategy to gain the trust of a person related to the criminal group he was investigating. It was, according to the writing endorsed by his superior, Abel Marín Seoane , a plan to appear easily “corruptible.” In the document, the Civil Guard disqualified the information published by this medium and maintained that the statements heard in the audios were “ recklessly false” or “crude and implausible . ” “He regretted,” that is, the way in which he carried out his action, without informing his superior or involving other members of the team.
In his statement before Judge Pedraz, who charged him shortly after listening to the person with whom the Civil Guard interacts in the audio, Bravo has assured that everything he says in those audios is invented and that he acted that way because She had a suspicion that the person she was with was involved in the alleged investigation that was ongoing. Thus, he has maintained the version that he already gave in the July letter, reaffirming that all the illegal actions that he claims to have committed in the audios are false. He has equally insisted that he never put up illegal beacons.
The civil guard Bravo has refused at all times to answer any question that was asked by a lawyer other than his own . What's more, when one of the defense wanted to ask him where and to whom he took the mobile phone on which he received an alleged sexual photo of the woman whom he claims he was investigating, fearing that the image was a Trojan, He said that “I do not respond to this man” , to which the judge responded that “the question is important and that he makes it his own” .
Bravo has not been able to answer the question asked, although he has hesitated and, to get out of the situation, has explained that he took him to a computer scientist outside the Civil Guard Corps and that this computer scientist, whose full name he has not been able to give either , He looked over his phone and assured her that it wasn't a Trojan.
When asked by the Prosecutor's Office if he keeps the WhatsApp messages , since he states that he provided his personal phone number to this person as part of his investigation strategy, Bravo has said that he does not have them , although those corresponding to the corporate phone number "believe yes”, but claims that “it is not in his power”.
Bravo maintains before the judge the version he maintained Email Data in the letter he sent him last July : everything was a strategy to gain the trust of a person related to the criminal group he was investigating. It was, according to the writing endorsed by his superior, Abel Marín Seoane , a plan to appear easily “corruptible.” In the document, the Civil Guard disqualified the information published by this medium and maintained that the statements heard in the audios were “ recklessly false” or “crude and implausible . ” “He regretted,” that is, the way in which he carried out his action, without informing his superior or involving other members of the team.
In his statement before Judge Pedraz, who charged him shortly after listening to the person with whom the Civil Guard interacts in the audio, Bravo has assured that everything he says in those audios is invented and that he acted that way because She had a suspicion that the person she was with was involved in the alleged investigation that was ongoing. Thus, he has maintained the version that he already gave in the July letter, reaffirming that all the illegal actions that he claims to have committed in the audios are false. He has equally insisted that he never put up illegal beacons.
The civil guard Bravo has refused at all times to answer any question that was asked by a lawyer other than his own . What's more, when one of the defense wanted to ask him where and to whom he took the mobile phone on which he received an alleged sexual photo of the woman whom he claims he was investigating, fearing that the image was a Trojan, He said that “I do not respond to this man” , to which the judge responded that “the question is important and that he makes it his own” .
Bravo has not been able to answer the question asked, although he has hesitated and, to get out of the situation, has explained that he took him to a computer scientist outside the Civil Guard Corps and that this computer scientist, whose full name he has not been able to give either , He looked over his phone and assured her that it wasn't a Trojan.
When asked by the Prosecutor's Office if he keeps the WhatsApp messages , since he states that he provided his personal phone number to this person as part of his investigation strategy, Bravo has said that he does not have them , although those corresponding to the corporate phone number "believe yes”, but claims that “it is not in his power”.