Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 21:34:10 GMT -6
Fide's collection of papers on the economic, legal, and political challenges that arise from nationalist, populist, and identarian movements both in Spain, the EU and Latin America, as a whole is expected to be published before the end of the 2021-22 academic year. Yesterday, the group of cross-border experts (lawyers, academics, economists, businesses and scientists) that have been working on these conclusions met in Madrid to recap the advances made by each Working Group and to define the final conclusions for the paper. led-by Christopher , Chair of Fide International Academic Council and Cristina Jimenez, President of Fide, Fide has organized a series of groups of experts from diverse academic and professional backgrounds who, since early 2021 have been researching and working on these papers. All the Working Group members and leaders met at Fide's Congress in Oxford in early April 2022. The congress was organized under the auspices of Fide's International academic Council, and turned out to be 3 days of productive and constructive debates and talks.
Ever since then, the WGs have been focused on delivering adequate recommendations to approach populist and nationalist movements from legal and economic perspectives. After yesterday's deliberations, all WG leaders and their members have entered the final stage and will soon turn their definitive conclusions for their publication in late June or early July. The conclusions paper will also include expert pieces on EU refugee externalisation policies, climate change issues (with specific reference to the outcome of the Conference of the Parties (COP) 26 in November 2021 in Glasgow), and misinformation and free speech in modern democratic societies. , as well as aspects of the impact of nationalist/ populist policies on the funding of South American pension Phone Number List schemes where there have been unexpected calls on funds to deal with the effects of COVID-19. afterward, Fide's editorial team will seek to ensure coherence, not least by developing complementary themes. Even now, several themes are readily discernible: In a few areas of possible EU-level action to address the populist concerns, radical reforms are going to be proposed for EU competence. the EU and the Member States have grappled with the implications of “more EU”, not “less EU”. That inevitably raises the question of whether that will fuel populism.
It also raises the question of what role the principle of subsidiarity will play. By contrast, it may increase the continue to do so if Hungary left the EU. All this could be more troublesome for the EU than coping with Hungary as a rule-breaking and uncooperative insider, especially if the EU manages to suspend Hungary's voting rights, including its right to veto sanctions against Russia. There is also a dimension to this which transcends the particular case. The EU is half-way or more to becoming a federal Union. Its citizens enjoy the right to live and work anywhere in that Union, and the right to benefit from the Union's core values of democracy, the rule of law, equality and human rights. The governments of Hungary and Poland are anti-Brussels, but they do not advocate EU withdrawal, and public opinion in those countries favors eu membership. Marine Le Pen improved her standing de ella with French electors when she stopped calling for France to leave the focus on solidarity. where it is accepted that there is a role for regulation at the EU or International level, regulation ought to comply with Better Regulation principles.
Ever since then, the WGs have been focused on delivering adequate recommendations to approach populist and nationalist movements from legal and economic perspectives. After yesterday's deliberations, all WG leaders and their members have entered the final stage and will soon turn their definitive conclusions for their publication in late June or early July. The conclusions paper will also include expert pieces on EU refugee externalisation policies, climate change issues (with specific reference to the outcome of the Conference of the Parties (COP) 26 in November 2021 in Glasgow), and misinformation and free speech in modern democratic societies. , as well as aspects of the impact of nationalist/ populist policies on the funding of South American pension Phone Number List schemes where there have been unexpected calls on funds to deal with the effects of COVID-19. afterward, Fide's editorial team will seek to ensure coherence, not least by developing complementary themes. Even now, several themes are readily discernible: In a few areas of possible EU-level action to address the populist concerns, radical reforms are going to be proposed for EU competence. the EU and the Member States have grappled with the implications of “more EU”, not “less EU”. That inevitably raises the question of whether that will fuel populism.
It also raises the question of what role the principle of subsidiarity will play. By contrast, it may increase the continue to do so if Hungary left the EU. All this could be more troublesome for the EU than coping with Hungary as a rule-breaking and uncooperative insider, especially if the EU manages to suspend Hungary's voting rights, including its right to veto sanctions against Russia. There is also a dimension to this which transcends the particular case. The EU is half-way or more to becoming a federal Union. Its citizens enjoy the right to live and work anywhere in that Union, and the right to benefit from the Union's core values of democracy, the rule of law, equality and human rights. The governments of Hungary and Poland are anti-Brussels, but they do not advocate EU withdrawal, and public opinion in those countries favors eu membership. Marine Le Pen improved her standing de ella with French electors when she stopped calling for France to leave the focus on solidarity. where it is accepted that there is a role for regulation at the EU or International level, regulation ought to comply with Better Regulation principles.